Retail_HQ
/Performance

Performance Management

Reviews, ratings, goals and improvement plans across every branch and department.

Reviews due
186
Completed
142
Avg rating
3.6 / 5
On improvement plan
14

Rating distribution

5 · Outstanding9%
4 · Exceeds26%
3 · Meets48%
2 · Below13%
1 · Unsatisfactory4%

Review cycle status

H1 cycle
DepartmentDueCompletedAvg ratingCalibratedStatus
Sales floor62543.5YesOn track
Cashiering48323.4YesBehind
Warehouse34303.7YesOn track
Pharmacy14124.1NoCalibrate
Admin18103.8NoBehind
Security1043.2NoAt risk

Performance reviews

Set goals, score reviews and log feedback · acting as HR Manager · click any row to open the record

ReferenceEmployeeSiteCycleReviewing managerScore (1-5)StatusRecord
PRF-1000Tunde BelloGwarinpa SupermarketProbation reviewEmeka Uzo3.4Awaiting sign-offView record →
PRF-1007Grace OtuApo Pharmacy & StoreH1 2026Chinelo Umeh4.6CompletedView record →
PRF-1014Musa BalaCentral WarehouseH1 2026Segun Adeyemi2.4Improvement planView record →
Reviews due
186
Completed
142
Avg rating
3.6 / 5
On improvement plan
14
Weekly change
+2.4%vs last week
Review coverage
91%+3pp

Operational workspace — what is happening

Performance status board

Live
Reviews due
186
Completed
142
Overdue
44
Calibration pending
3 depts
Improvement plans
14
Promotion ready
74

Performance by role family

H1 cycle
Role familyEmployeesAvg ratingTop performersImprovement plansPromotion ready
Cashiering2863.424618
Sales floor4123.538422
Warehouse2243.731214
Pharmacy964.11908
Admin1323.81619
Security843.2513

Performance activity feed

Live feed
  1. Review completed08:15
    Wuse 2 floor team — 12 reviews
  2. Calibration held09:40
    Warehouse leadership session
  3. Improvement plan opened11:20
    2 cashiers — till accuracy
  4. Rating disputed13:05
    One appeal received
  5. Promotion nominated15:35
    6 supervisors put forward

Performance work queue

6 in queue
Complete 44 overdue reviews
People Ops
Open
Calibrate 3 departments
People Ops
Open
Close 14 improvement plans
People Ops
Open
Process 1 rating appeal
People Ops
Open
Publish promotion shortlist
People Ops
Open
Set H2 goals
People Ops
Open

Analytics workspace — why is it happening

Performance trend — last 7 days

Last 7 days
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun

Rating mix

Outstanding9%
Exceeds26%
Meets48%
Below13%
Unsatisfactory4%

Reviews completed by week

W26W27W28W29W30W31

Performance ranking

Ranked
#1
Pharmacy
4.1 avg
92%
#2
Admin
3.8 avg
84%
#3
Warehouse
3.7 avg
80%
#4
Sales floor
3.5 avg
72%
#5
Security
3.2 avg
58%

Performance heatmap — site × period

Heat map
Q1Q2Q3Q4H1H2
Wuse 2
79%
58%
95%
86%
46%
42%
Gwarinpa
75%
71%
84%
65%
68%
41%
Apo
40%
84%
77%
69%
40%
75%
Warehouse
41%
46%
77%
42%
41%
63%
Head Office
93%
80%
84%
84%
64%
48%

Performance scorecard

Multi-factor
CompletionCalibrationGoal qualityFeedbackFairnessFollow-through

Management workspace — exceptions & approvals

Exception centre

3 open
44 reviews overduePeople Ops
Security and admin are furthest behind
Three departments uncalibratedPeople Ops
Ratings not comparable across sites
One formal appealPeople Ops
Cashier disputes a 'below' rating

Pending approvals

Awaiting sign-off
  • 6 promotion nominations
    Exec committee
    Review
  • 14 improvement plans
    HR Manager
    Review
  • 1 rating appeal
    Head of HR
    Review

Manager action queue

Assigned
ActionOwnerDuePriority
Close overdue reviewsLine managers22 AugLow
Run calibration sessionsHR Manager15 AugMedium
Publish H2 goalsPeople Ops31 AugMedium

Escalations

Routed upward
Escalation — 44 reviews overdueEscalated
Security and admin are furthest behind
Watchlist — Three departments uncalibratedEscalated
Ratings not comparable across sites

Executive intelligence — what to do next

Executive summary

Auto-generated · demo

142 of 186 reviews are complete with a group average of 3.6. Quality is undermined by three uncalibrated departments and a long tail of overdue reviews in security and admin.

89
Health score
Strong
67
Opportunity score
Stable
45
Risk score
Watch
75
Confidence
Stable

Key insights

  • Pharmacy consistently rates highest, partly from a smaller and more experienced team.
  • Employees with quarterly check-ins score 0.4 higher than annual-only reviewers.
  • Improvement plans close successfully in 71% of cases.

Business risks

Rating inflation
Uncalibrated departments distort promotion decisions.
Manager capacity
Overdue reviews cluster with the busiest managers.

Growth opportunities

Promotion pipeline
74 employees are assessed promotion-ready.
Lightweight check-ins
Monthly 15-minute check-ins raise engagement.

Performance highlights

Reviews due
186
Completed
142
Avg rating
3.6 / 5
On improvement plan
14

AI recommendations

Confidence weighted
Mandate calibration before sign-off
No ratings published without a session.
88%
Move to quarterly check-ins
Replace one heavy annual review.
79%
Use promotion pool for vacancies
Fill 60% of open supervisory roles internally.
85%

Forecast

Projected review volume and coverage for the coming week.
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun

Recommended actions

  1. 1.Review performance exceptions
  2. 2.Approve pending review items
  3. 3.Publish performance update